You get:
- no strong opinions (bland, forgettable)
- no personal stories (feels corporate)
- no contrarian views (just conventional wisdom)
- no lessons from failure (too polished)
- newsletters that could have been written by anyone
But thought leadership is not safe.
It is opinionated, personal, and sometimes uncomfortable.
- A strong point of view (not “on the one hand”)
- Personal stories (vulnerability builds trust)
- Lessons from failure (credibility)
- Strategic observations (value beyond news)
Without a unique voice, you’re not a thought leader — you’re a content producer.
This framework forces AI to write opinionated, personal newsletters.
Assume the role of a thought leader who shares strong opinions, personal lessons, and strategic insights. Your task is to write a thought leadership newsletter. STRUCTURE: 1. SUBJECT LINE (intriguing, opinionated) 2. PERSONAL HOOK (1-2 sentences) - A recent experience or observation 3. THE OPINION (2-3 paragraphs) - What you believe (that others might disagree with) 4. THE EVIDENCE (1-2 paragraphs) - Why you think this (personal experience, data, examples) 5. THE IMPLICATION (1-2 paragraphs) - What readers should do with this insight 6. THE QUESTION (1 sentence) - Prompt for reply engagement Generate: 1. SUBJECT LINE (3 options) 2. FULL NEWSLETTER (600-900 words) 3. REPLY PROMPT (question for readers) INPUTS: Your Area of Expertise: [WHAT DO YOU TEACH OR SELL?] The Conventional Wisdom (what most people believe): [E.G., "You need a large audience to make money online"] Your Contrarian View: [E.G., "A small, engaged audience is more valuable"] A Personal Story or Lesson (from your experience): [E.G., "I made $50k from a list of 500 people"] Target Audience: [WHO ARE YOUR SUBSCRIBERS?] RULES: - Take a clear stance (no "on the other hand") - Include a personal story (vulnerability builds trust) - The opinion must be specific (not "marketing is changing") - Evidence must come from your experience (not just "research shows") - End with a question (drives replies) - Write as you speak (conversational, not academic)
- Your unique experiences are your differentiator — share them.
- Contrarian views get shared more than conventional wisdom.
- Don’t be contrarian just for attention — believe what you write.
- Reply rates are a key metric for thought leadership newsletters.
- Consistency builds authority — send on a predictable schedule.
Your Area of Expertise: Sales training and pitch coaching
The Conventional Wisdom: “You need a polished, scripted sales pitch to close deals”
Your Contrarian View: “The best sales conversations are unscripted, messy, and human”
A Personal Story or Lesson: “I closed a $500k deal by admitting I didn’t know the answer to a client’s question”
Target Audience: Sales professionals who feel trapped by scripts
This framework improves outcomes by forcing:
- opinionated stance (differentiation)
- personal story (vulnerability)
- contrarian view (shareability)
- experience-based evidence (credibility)
- reply-driving question (engagement)
Great thought leadership newsletters don’t inform — they challenge and inspire.
Build Better AI Systems
Subscribe for advanced prompt engineering, AI copywriting tools, newsletter frameworks, and practical strategies for writers and creators.