You get:
- links to topically unrelated pages (confusing)
- low-value links that don’t help users
- too many links on a page (diluted authority)
- links that point to outdated or irrelevant content
- wasted PageRank on unimportant pages
But link relevance is not subjective.
It is measured by topical connection.
- Highly relevant: same topic cluster, supports main content
- Moderately relevant: related topic, useful context
- Low relevance: weak topical connection
- Irrelevant: no topical connection (remove)
Without relevance scoring, you dilute your site’s authority.
This framework forces AI to rate and improve link relevance.
Assume the role of a link quality auditor who scores internal link relevance. Your task is to evaluate and score internal links. Generate: 1. LINK RELEVANCE SCORES (for each link) - Source page - Target page - Relevance score (1-10) - Justification for score 2. LOW-RELEVANCE LINKS (score 1-4) - List of links to consider removing or replacing - Why they are low relevance 3. MODERATE-RELEVANCE LINKS (score 5-7) - Links that could be improved - Recommendations for strengthening relevance 4. HIGH-RELEVANCE LINKS (score 8-10) - Good examples to replicate - Why they work 5. CLEANUP RECOMMENDATIONS - Links to remove - Links to replace - New links to add INPUTS: Existing Internal Links (source → target with context): [LIST OR DESCRIBE] Source Page Topics: [LIST] Target Page Topics: [LIST] Topical Clusters (how topics relate): [DESCRIBE] Page Importance (pillar vs. supporting): [CLASSIFY] RULES: - Score 8-10: highly relevant, supports main content - Score 5-7: somewhat relevant, could be improved - Score 1-4: low relevance, consider removing - Remove links that are completely irrelevant - Replace low-relevance links with better targets - Don't exceed 3-5 internal links per 500 words - Focus link authority on pillar pages
- Remove irrelevant links (they waste authority).
- Replace low-relevance links with better targets.
- Keep 3-5 internal links per 500 words (optimal density).
- Focus link authority on your most important pages.
- Re-audit after adding new content that may create better targets.
Existing Internal Links:
– Pricing guide → client proposals (relevant: pricing relates to proposals)
– Pricing guide → productivity tips (low relevance)
– Productivity post → pricing guide (moderate relevance)
– Client proposals → pricing guide (high relevance)
– Productivity post → client proposals (irrelevant)
Source Page Topics: Freelance pricing, productivity systems, client proposals
Target Page Topics: Same as above
Topical Clusters: Pricing cluster: pricing, rates, value-based pricing, negotiations; Client cluster: proposals, contracts, communication; Productivity cluster: time management, tools, systems
Page Importance: Pricing guide (pillar), productivity (supporting), client proposals (supporting)
This framework improves outcomes by forcing:
- relevance scoring (quality measurement)
- low-relevance identification (cleanup)
- moderate-relevance improvement (upgrade)
- high-relevance replication (best practices)
- cleanup recommendations (execution)
Great internal linking is relevant — every link serves a purpose.
Build Better AI Systems
Subscribe for advanced prompt engineering, AI SEO tools, internal linking frameworks, and practical strategies for marketers and business owners.